|
|
- “Unbounding the future” Eric Drexler
- “Worries on IP”- the Electronic Engineering times, UK, March 2002
- “Nanotech Dreams”- J.M.Perkel [vol.16.no.5, pg 34 to 36 (2002)]
- “Nanotechnology and Regulatory Policy- Three futures” – Glenn Harlan Reynolds, (17 Harv J.Law&Tech 179)
- “Nanotechnology Summary”- Eric Drexler (1990, Encyclopedia Brittanica)
- www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html
- www.uspto.gov
- “Patenting Nanotechnology in India”- Sanjay Pandey
- “Societal Implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology”- M.S. Roco & W.S.bainbridge, (eds 2001)
- “Protecting the next Small Thing- Nanotechnology & the Reverse Doctrine of equivalents”- Andrew Wasson (2004) Duke Law & Tech Rev.10)
- “Ethics of Nanotechnology @ the frontline”- (19 SCC &HT LJ 481,8487 (2003))
- www.lexisnexis.com
- www.westlaw.com
- www.heinonline.com
- Khanijou Siddharth, ‘Patent Inequality?: Rethinking The Application of Strict Liability to Patent Law in the Nanotechnology era.’ 12 Journal of Technology, Law & Policy (2006) 179,181;
- Zovko Nicholas M, ‘Nanotechnology and the Experimental Use Defense to Patent Infringement’ 37 McGeorge Law Review 129,131 (2006).
- www.uspto.gov
- Sanjay Pandey ,“Patenting Nanotechnology in India” http://www.intelproplaw.com/Articles/cgi/download.cgi?v=1125360993
- M.S. Roco & W.S.Bainbridge, Societal Implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology, (2001)
- Andrew Wasson ,“Protecting the next Small Thing- Nanotechnology & the Reverse Doctrine of equivalents” (2004) Duke Law & Technology Review 10)
- “Ethics of Nanotechnology @ the frontline”- (19 SCC &HT LJ 481,8487 (2003))
- Decision T12/81 BAYER/Diastereomers [1979-85] EPOR Vol B 308 (at 312).
- http://www.epo.org/focus/issues/nanotechnology.html, accessed in May 2008.
- J.M.Perkel, Nanotech Dreams, [vol.16.no.5, pg 34 to 36 (2002)].
- Glenn Harlan Reynolds, “Nanotechnology and Regulatory Policy- Three futures” 17 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 179.
- Eric Drexler, Nanotechnology Summary, (1990, Encyclopedia Brittanica)
- www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html
- Eric Drexler, Unbounding the future, (1990, Encyclopedia Brittanica)
- Lemley Mark A, ‘Patenting Nanotechnology’, 58 Stanford Law Review 601,605 (2005).
- Diamond v. Chakraborty 447 U.S 303(1980).
- “Worries on IP” Editorial, The Electronic Engineering times, UK, March 2002
- D.S. Almeling, Note: Patenting Nanotechnology: Problems with the Utility Requirement, Stanford Technology Law Review 2004, N1, at page 14.
Khanijou Siddharth, ‘Patent Inequality?: Rethinking The Application of Strict Liability to Patent Law in the Nanotechnology era.’ 12 Journal of Technology, Law & Policy (2006) 179,181; Zovko Nicholas M, ‘Nanotechnology and the Experimental Use Defense to Patent Infringement’ 37 McGeorge Law Review 129,131 (2006).
www.uspto.gov
Sanjay Pandey ,“Patenting Nanotechnology in India” http://www.intelproplaw.com/Articles/cgi/download.cgi?v=1125360993
M.S. Roco & W.S.Bainbridge, Societal Implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology, (2001)
Andrew Wasson ,“Protecting the next Small Thing- Nanotechnology & the Reverse Doctrine of equivalents” (2004) Duke Law & Technology Review 10)
“Ethics of Nanotechnology @ the frontline”- (19 SCC &HT LJ 481,8487 (2003))
Decision T12/81 BAYER/Diastereomers [1979-85] EPOR Vol B 308 (at 312).
http://www.epo.org/focus/issues/nanotechnology.html, accessed in May 2008.
J.M.Perkel, Nanotech Dreams, [vol.16.no.5, pg 34 to 36 (2002)].
Glenn Harlan Reynolds, ‘Nanotechnology and Regulatory Policy- Three futures’ 17 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 179.
Eric Drexler, Nanotechnology Summary, (1990, Encyclopedia Brittanica)
www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html
Eric Drexler, Unbounding the future, (1990, Encyclopedia Brittanica)
Lemley Mark A, ‘Patenting Nanotechnology’, 58 Stanford Law Review 601,605 (2005).
447 U.S 303(1980).
|
|
|
